Byron
was a Presbyterian, working on his Ph. D. in Old Testament, and it was from him
that I first learned about the “perspicuity of scripture.” Simply put, this notion is an argument for
the clarity of the Bible, that anyone can pick it up and glean the scripture’s
essential meaning. This notion is
illustrated by the anecdotal stories of persons who pick up Gideon Bibles in
hotel rooms and who, upon reading, experience life-changing conversions.
But
if the Bible is so clear, then why do we study it so endlessly; parsing sentences
in Hebrew; doing word studies seeking the Aramaic phrasing behind the Greek;
piecing together ancient manuscripts to infer the social or cultural context of
the times in which they were written in the hopes of gaining greater insight
into the meaning of each text.
If
the Bible is so clear, why do churches send young preachers to seminary to
sharpen their exegetical skills, or to graduate schools to write novel-length
theses on a single word’s meaning? Well
did the writer of Ecclesiastes understand this phenomenon when he wrote, “of
the making of many books there is no end (12:12).”
John
concludes his Gospel with these words: “there
are also many other things that Jesus did; if every one of them were written
down, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be
written (21:25).” There has been nothing
else so thoroughly studied as the Bible, and while the world has contained all
the books written so far, we are continually pushing those limits.
I am
often suspicious when I hear someone begin a sentence with the phrase, “The
Bible is clear . . . ,” because what often follows is a proposition stated as
cold, hard truth, but about which there are undoubtedly various opinions. The phrase, “the Bible is clear,” is often
used as a way of cutting off any contrary, or dissenting opinion. This tendency is captured in the well-worn
argument that many of us have heard: “God
said it. I believe it. That settles it.”
Actually,
that settles nothing. When one closes
off all discussion, or disallows any argument, then one has failed to grasp the
very essence of the Bible as literature.
What we often fail to realize is that the Bible is often in a dialogue,
or even an argument, with itself. As a
simple illustration:
Proverbs
26:4 ---“Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto
him.” And this is followed immediately
by a contrary opinion,
Proverbs
26:5 --- “Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own
conceit.”
Perhaps
the Bible is clear in its essence. But
the history of Biblical study has shown us that such clarity comes only through
constant conversation and dialogue. How
much more we might learn if we precede our interpretations not with, “the Bible
is clear,” but “this is what I hear God saying in this text; what do you hear?”